lunes, 24 de mayo de 2010

Ding an sich of a meaning

The ding an sich of a meaning is the essence of the thing which remains immutable beyond the time and the space, above all the circumstances. For instance a dog is a dog two thousand years ago and in the essence is the same dog now and in the future. A dog is a dog if it is brave or if it is quiet, never mind if the dog is quiet or brave. It never mind if the dog is big or small it will always be a dog.
Everything have the same condition, a human being, the gold, the water, a star. They have the condition that define them by themselves.
The ding an sich is the meaning of the meaning.

domingo, 23 de mayo de 2010

Is sanity power?


The power is sane when it is in the hand of good people and power is bad when it is in the hand of bad people. If the power is in the right hands it will serve to do good and change things, but if power is in the hand of bad people it will be used for their own benefit, for the abuse of people, because that is their nature and what power did was to discover what was really. Power does not corrupt it discovers the corrupts.
For example: If a person becomes a director of a educational institution and is a good person will remain, and will use that power to improve the institution and will look for the benefit of all,
but if that person is not good when it comes to director, he or she will be an abuser of teachers, students and will use the power for their own benefit.
That's why I think that power is good or bad depending of who has it.

Neurosis


One of my neurosis is that, when I walk into a messy room, I want to organize everything because I get stressed with the disorder. That's why everything in my room must be in the place.
I think that it is originated in the fact that since always in my house we all have to help my father to find his things like glasses, keys, telephone, etc, because he never remember where the thing are because he never put the things in the place, and it makes all waste time looking for his things.

domingo, 16 de mayo de 2010

Capilism vs. Socialism



I think that socialism in theory is the most appropriate system for the human beings because it prensent to us a relationship of equality between everyone and allow us to have education, health, to have a home, etc. Without matter their economic capacity of each person. And the capitalism concentrates the economic power in a few hands, and this people are the only ones that have access to a good education, health, to have a home and havet the capacity of feed their families without trouble.



I think if there was a truly socialist society this would be more just and more human than the one we live know that makes ones died from hunger and the others are sick of obesity.

In a socialist system everyone could have the same access to the same type of education therefore everyone would have the same oportunities because in this system, is the State the one responsible of providig these services while the capitalism is private enterprise that provides these services therefore they will access only those who can afford them. Is not sane to concentrate the wealth in a few hands, its necessary a redistribution in a same way to make from this society a better society more fair and more equal.




In the world, today one billion people in the capitalist world went to bed hungry. So the question is where is the richness?. Today in the world died from hunger six billion people , all this victims live in capitalist countries, no one live in Cuba so, what is the richness of capitalism?.


The capitalism is an insane system because ppush the people in order to consume more and more, to waist more and more, in this way people believe that they are happy but the question is Why if they are so happy in the states for instance people has to consume seventy million dollars each day in medicine against depression?. It is a very suspicious way for being happy or for being richness.


The philosophy of the capitalism is that you have to be rich, but the world and the life is made of opposite or opposition so if hte richness exists, the porberty exist so the richness of a human group only can be explained based on the poberty of the other people.


The only power that creates richness is the work of the people not the poberty. If you the owner of a piece of land, that land without work will be a group of bushes. If the land give richness to the owner, the reason is the work of the workers.


The property of the land and the property of the richness has the routes in the violence, when somebody took advantage usig weapons or cheats. This difference increased with the time, is the reason that every day there are more richness in the hands of the rich people , and there are more and more poberty.


On the other hand the system work perfectly with a good number of employ people because this people are the support for lows salaries, and low salaries for poor people means profits for rich people.


The owner of an Industry pay a salarie to a worker not dor justice but for bussines in the same way than the farmer gives grass to the cow. In order to explote the cow using the milk and later the meat.


The capitalism is the system of the power, is the injustice that denys the brotherhood and the dignity of the people and it is a system that converts people into a silly and bug and dirty stomach, that only consume and consume rubish.